Advertisement

Analysis of teaching methods in anaesthesia in the undergraduate curriculum of four veterinary universities

      Abstract

      Objective

      To design a holistic audit tool to assess the effectiveness of anaesthesia teaching strategies, and thereby to study veterinary undergraduate teaching methods in different geographical areas.

      Study design

      Qualitative study using interviews of university staff and students to identify common themes and differences in teaching veterinary anaesthesia.

      Methods

      An audit was performed using an audit tool in four veterinary universities (École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, France; Royal Veterinary College, UK; University of Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Alma mater studiorum - Università di Bologna, Italy). First, an open-question interview of anaesthesia head of service (60–90 minutes) identified the pedagogical strategies in order to conceive a subsequent semi-directive interview formulated as a SWOT analysis (Strength/Weaknesses/Opportunity/Threats). Second, the SWOT reflection was conducted by a second staff member and focussed on: 1) general organization; 2) topics for pre-rotation teaching; 3) teaching methods for clinical rotation; and 4) assessment methods. Qualitative analysis of the interview responses was performed with semi-structured interviews. Finally, the students evaluated their teaching through a students’ questionnaire generated from the output of both interviews.

      Results

      A group of nine lecturers and 106 students participated in the study at four different sites. Preclinical teaching ranged from 13 to 24 hours (median 15 hours). Clinical teaching ranged from 4 to 80 hours (median 60 hours). Overall, all faculties perceived time as a limitation and attempted to design strategies to achieve the curriculum expectations and optimize teaching using more time-efficient exercises. Large animal anaesthesia teaching was found to be a common area of weakness. Internal feedback was delivered to each university, whereas generalized results were shared globally.

      Conclusions

      This preliminary study proved the generalizability of the protocol used. Recruiting a larger pool of universities would help to identify and promote efficient teaching strategies and innovations for training competent new graduates in an ever-expanding curriculum.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Anderson C.
        Presenting and evaluating qualitative research.
        Am J Pharm Educ. 2010; 74: 141
        • Aubin-Auger I.
        • Mercier A.
        • Baumann L.
        • et al.
        Introduction à la recherche qualitative.
        Exercer. 2008; 19: 142-145
        • Berg B.L.
        • Lune H.
        Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences.
        9th edn. Pearson Education Limited, UK2010: 22-42 (Global Edition)
        • Bishop P.A.
        • Herron R.L.
        Use and misuse of the Likert item responses and other ordinal measures.
        Int J Exerc Sci. 2015; 8: 297-302
        • d’Anselme O.
        Analysis of pedagogical methods in teaching anaesthesia at veterinarian universities.
        Ecole Nationale Veterinaire d'Alfort. 2018; : 21-91
        • Denzin N.
        • Lincoln K.
        Introduction: the discipline and the practice of qualitative research.
        in: Denzin N. Lincoln K. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, CA, USA2000: 1-28
        • Dicicco-Bloom B.
        • Crabtree B.F.
        The qualitative research interview.
        Med Educ. 2006; 40: 314-321
        • Esposito P.
        • Dal Canton A.
        Clinical audit, a valuable tool to improve quality of care: General methodology and applications in nephrology.
        World J Nephrol. 2014; 3: 249-255
        • Harris I.
        Qualitative methods.
        in: Norman G.R. International Handbook of Research in Medical Education. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands2002: 45-95
        • Holden J.D.
        Hawthorne effects and research into professional practice.
        J Eval Clin Pract. 2001; 7: 65-70
        • Imbert G.
        L'entretien semi-directif : à la frontière de la santé publique et de l'anthropologie.
        Rech Soins Infirm. 2010; 3: 23-34
        • International Society for Performance Improvement
        Handbook of improving performance in the workplace.
        Jossey-Bass, CA, USA2010
        • Jaffrelot M.
        • Croguennec Y.
        • Ammirati C.
        • L'Her E.
        Les méthodes pédagogiques d’avenir. Société Française des Infirmier(e)s Anesthésistes.
        2012 (Last accessed)
        • Leigh D.
        • Moseley J.L.
        • Dessinger J.C.
        • et al.
        SWOT Analysis.
        in: Silber K.H. Foshay W.R. Leigh D. In Handbook of improving performance in the workplace. Pfeiffer Essential Resources for Training and HR Professional, Pfeiffer, CA, USA2010: 144-183
        • Lingard L.
        • Kennedy T.
        Qualitative research methods in medical education.
        in: Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice. Wiley-Blackwell, NJ, USA2010: 323-333
        • Mercier-Coubris D.
        Amélioration des formations théoriques basée sur un outil utilisant des évaluations étudiantes.
        PhD thesis, Poitiers Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie. 2013; : 40-84
        • Merriam S.
        • Tisdell E.J.
        Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation.
        4th edn. John Wiley & Sons, NJ, USA2015
        • Miller W.
        • Crabtree B.
        Depth interviewing.
        in: Doing qualitative research. 2nd edn. Sage Publications, CA, USA1999: 89-107
        • Mucchielli A.
        Dictionnaire des méthodes qualitatives en sciences humaines et sociales.
        3e edn. Armand Colin, France2009
        • Pope C.
        • Mays N.
        Qualitative research in health care.
        3rd edn. BMJ Books, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK2006: 1-150
        • Reeves S.
        • Lewin S.
        • Zwarenstein M.
        Using qualitative interviews within medical education research: why we must raise the 'quality bar'.
        Med Educ. 2006; 40: 291-292
        • Sidhu N.S.
        • Weller J.M.
        • Mitchell S.J.
        Teaching and learning in undergraduate anaesthesia: a quantitative and qualitative analysis of practice at the University of Auckland.
        Anaesth Intens Care. 2015; 43: 740-749