Advertisement

Dose and cardiopulmonary effects of propofol alone or with midazolam for induction of anesthesia in critically ill dogs

Published:April 11, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2020.03.006

      Abstract

      Objective

      To determine the dose and cardiopulmonary effects of propofol alone or with midazolam for induction of anesthesia in American Society of Anesthesiologists status ≥III dogs requiring emergency abdominal surgery.

      Study design

      Prospective, randomized, blinded, clinical trial.

      Animals

      A total of 19 client-owned dogs.

      Methods

      Dogs were sedated with fentanyl (2 μg kg–1) intravenously (IV) for instrumentation for measurement of heart rate, arterial blood pressure, cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance index, arterial blood gases, respiratory rate and rectal temperature. After additional IV fentanyl (3 μg kg–1), the quality of sedation was scored and cardiopulmonary variables recorded. Induction of anesthesia was with IV propofol (1 mg kg–1) and saline (0.06 mL kg–1; group PS; nine dogs) or midazolam (0.3 mg kg–1; group PM; 10 dogs), with additional propofol (0.25 mg kg–1) IV every 6 seconds until endotracheal intubation. Induction/intubation quality was scored, and anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane. Variables were recorded for 5 minutes with the dog in lateral recumbency, breathing spontaneously, and then in dorsal recumbency with mechanical ventilation for the next 15 minutes. A general linear mixed model was used with post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons between groups (p < 0.05).

      Results

      There were no differences in group demographics, temperature and cardiopulmonary variables between groups or within groups before or after induction. The propofol doses for induction of anesthesia were significantly different between groups, 1.9 ± 0.5 and 1.1 ± 0.5 mg kg–1 for groups PS and PM, respectively, and the induction/intubation score was significantly better for group PM.

      Conclusions and clinical relevance

      Midazolam co-induction reduced the propofol induction dose and improved the quality of induction in critically ill dogs without an improvement in cardiopulmonary variables, when compared with a higher dose of propofol alone.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Brodbelt D.
        • Blissitt K.
        • Hammond R.
        • et al.
        The risk of death: the confidential enquiry into perioperative small animal fatalities.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2008; 35: 365-373
        • Caines D.
        • Sinclair M.
        • Valverde A.
        • et al.
        Comparison of isoflurane and propofol for maintenance of anesthesia in dogs with intracranial disease undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2014; 41: 468-479
        • Covey-Crump G.L.
        • Murison P.J.
        Fentanyl or midazolam for co-induction of anaesthesia with propofol in dogs.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2008; 35: 463-472
        • Dyson D.H.
        • Maxie M.G.
        • Schnurr D.
        Morbidity and mortality associated with anesthetic management in small animal veterinary practice in Ontario.
        J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1998; 34: 325-335
        • Galletly D.C.
        • Buckley D.H.F.
        • Robinson B.J.
        • Corfiatis T.
        Heart rate variability during propofol anaesthesia.
        Br J Anaesth. 1994; 72: 219-220
        • Gomes V.H.
        • Monteiro E.R.
        • Dias R.S.
        • et al.
        Comparison of the sedative effects of morphine, meperidine or fentanyl, in combination with acepromazine, in dogs.
        Ciencia Rural. 2011; 41: 1411-1416
        • Goodchild C.S.
        • Serrao J.M.
        Cardiovascular effects of propofol in the anaesthetized dog.
        Br J Anaesth. 1989; 63: 87-92
        • Grimm K.A.
        • Tranquilli W.J.
        • Gross D.R.
        • et al.
        Cardiopulmonary effects of fentanyl in conscious dogs and dogs sedated with a continuous rate infusion of medetomidine.
        Am J Vet Res. 2005; 66: 1222-1226
        • Hopkins A.
        • Giuffrida M.
        • Larenza M.P.
        Midazolam, as a co-induction agent, has propofol sparing effects but also decreases systolic blood pressure in healthy dogs.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2014; 41: 64-72
        • Jones D.J.
        • Stehling L.C.
        • Zauder H.L.
        Cardiovascular responses to diazepam and midazolam maleate in the dog.
        Anesthesiology. 1979; 51: 430-434
        • Ilkiw J.E.
        Balanced anesthetic techniques in dogs and cats.
        Clin Tech Small Anim Pract. 1999; 14: 27-37
        • Keating S.C.
        • Kerr C.L.
        • Valverde A.
        • et al.
        Cardiopulmonary effects of intravenous fentanyl infusion in dogs during isoflurane anesthesia and with concurrent acepromazine or dexmedetomidine administration during anesthetic recovery.
        Am J Vet Res. 2013; 74: 672-682
        • King L.
        • Wohl J.
        • Manning A.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the survival prediction index as a model of risk stratification for clinical research in dogs admitted to intensive care units at four locations.
        Am J Vet Res. 2001; 62: 948-954
        • Lebowitz P.W.
        • Cote M.E.
        • Daniels A.L.
        • et al.
        Comparative cardiovascular effects of midazolam and thiopental in healthy patients.
        Anesth Analg. 1982; 61: 771-775
        • Lebowitz P.W.
        • Cote M.E.
        • Daniels A.L.
        • et al.
        Cardiovascular effects of midazolam and thiopentone for induction of anaesthesia in ill surgical patients.
        Can Anaesth Soc J. 1983; 30: 19-23
        • Liao P.
        Anesthetic and cardio-pulmonary effects of propofol or alfaxalone with or without midazolam co-induction in fentanyl sedated dogs. DVSc thesis.
        University of Guelph, 2016
        • Liao P.
        • Sinclair M.
        • Valverde A.
        • et al.
        Induction dose and recovery quality of propofol and alfaxalone with or without midazolam coinduction followed by total intravenous anesthesia in dogs.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2017; 44: 1016-1026
        • Martinez-Taboada F.
        • Leece E.A.
        Comparison of propofol with ketofol, a propofol–ketamine admixture, for induction of anaesthesia in healthy dogs.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2014; 41: 575-582
        • Marty J.
        • Gauzit R.
        • Lefevre P.
        • et al.
        Effects of diazepam and midazolam on baroreflex control of heart rate and on sympathetic activity in humans.
        Anesth Analg. 1986; 65: 113-119
        • McClune S.
        • McKay A.C.
        • Wright P.M.
        • et al.
        Synergistic interaction between midazolam and propofol.
        Br J Anaesth. 1992; 69: 240-245
        • Michard F.
        Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation.
        Anesthesiology. 2005; 103: 419-428
        • Minghella E.
        • Auckburally A.
        • Pawson P.
        • et al.
        Clinical effects of midazolam or lidocaine co-induction with a propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) in dogs.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2016; 43: 472-481
        • Ogawa Y.
        • Iwasaki K.
        • Shibata S.
        • et al.
        Different effects on circulatory control during volatile induction and maintenance of anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia: autonomic nervous activity and arterial cardiac baroreflex function evaluated by blood pressure and heart rate variability analysis.
        J Clin Anesth. 2006; 18: 87-95
        • Pagel P.S.
        • Hettrick D.A.
        • Kersten J.R.
        • et al.
        Cardiovascular effects of propofol in dogs with dilated cardiomyopathy.
        Anesthesiology. 1998; 88: 180-189
        • Portier K.
        • Ida K.K.
        The ASA status classification: what is the evidence for recommending its use in veterinary anesthesia? A systematic review.
        Front Vet Sci. 2018; 5: 204
        • Reves J.G.
        • Fragen R.J.
        • Vinik H.R.
        • Greenblatt D.J.
        Midazolam: pharmacology and uses.
        Anesthesiology. 1985; 62: 310-324
        • Robinson B.J.
        • Ebert T.J.
        • O’Brien T.J.
        • et al.
        Mechanisms whereby propofol mediates peripheral vasodilation in humans. Sympathoinhibition or direct vascular relaxation?.
        Anesthesiology. 1997; 86: 64-72
        • Robinson R.
        • Borer-Weir K.
        A dose titration study into the effects of diazepam or midazolam on the propofol dose requirements for induction of general anaesthesia in client owned dogs, premedicated with methadone and acepromazine.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2013; 40: 455-463
        • Sánchez A.
        • Belda E.
        • Escobar M.
        • et al.
        Effects of altering the sequence of midazolam and propofol during co-induction of anaesthesia.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2013; 40: 359-366
        • Sano T.
        • Nishimura R.
        • Kanazawa H.
        • et al.
        Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after single intravenous injection and constant rate infusion in dogs.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2006; 33: 266-273
        • Short T.G.
        • Chui P.T.
        Propofol and midazolam act synergistically in combination.
        Br J Anaesth. 1991; 67: 539-545
        • Sunzel M.
        • Paalzow L.
        • Berggreen L.
        • Eriksson I.
        Respiratory and cardiovascular effects in relation to plasma levels of midazolam and diazepam.
        Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1988; 25: 561-569
        • Xue F.S.
        • Zhang G.H.
        • Sun H.Y.
        • et al.
        Blood pressure and heart rate changes during intubation: a comparison of direct laryngoscopy and a fibreoptic method.
        Anaesthesia. 2006; 61: 444-448
        • Zapata A.
        • Laredo F.G.
        • Escobar M.
        • et al.
        Effects of midazolam before or after alfaxalone for co-induction of anaesthesia in healthy dogs.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2018; 45: 609-617