Advertisement

Continuous transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia in three dogs with abdominal pain

Published:February 28, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2018.02.003
      The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a regional anesthetic technique that provides analgesia to the ventral and lateral abdominal wall, including skin, mammary glands, abdominal subcutaneous tissue, abdominal muscles and parietal peritoneum. The TAP block was first described in humans by
      • Rafi A.N.
      Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle.
      . More recently, implantation of catheters for the TAP block was used to provide prolonged analgesia after major thoracoabdominal injuries (
      • Allcock E.
      • Spencer E.
      • Frazer R.
      • et al.
      Continuous transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block catheters in a combat surgical environment.
      ).
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and PersonalCorporate R&D Professionals
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Allcock E.
        • Spencer E.
        • Frazer R.
        • et al.
        Continuous transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block catheters in a combat surgical environment.
        Pain Med. 2010; 11: 1426-1429
        • Rafi A.N.
        Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle.
        Anaesthesia. 2001; 56: 1024-1026
        • Schroeder C.A.
        • Snyder L.B.
        • Tearney C.C.
        • et al.
        Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in the dog: an anatomical evaluation.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2011; 38: 267-271