Advertisement

Challenges of thermal nociceptive threshold testing in the donkey

      Abstract

      Objective

      To evaluate a thermal nociceptive threshold (TNT) testing device in the donkey, and the influence of potential confounding factors on TNTs.

      Animals

      Two groups (Group 1 and Group 2) of eight castrated male donkeys aged 4–9 years, weighing 105–170 kg.

      Methods

      TNTs were measured by heating a thermal probe on skin until an end-point behaviour (threshold temperature) or a cut-out temperature (51 °C) was reached. The withers and the dorsal aspect of the distal limb were used as sites for TNT testing. The effects on TNT of different confounding factors: the limb tested; rate of heating; and ambient temperature were evaluated. Data were analyzed using general linear models, and Mann-Whitney tests, p < 0.05 was considered significant.

      Results

      End-point behaviours (skin twitch or donkey looking at test device) when the thermal probe heated the withers were observed in approximately half of tests. TNT was (mean ± SD) 46.8 ± 2.85 °C. Subsequently the limb was evaluated as the test site in Group 1 followed by Group 2 donkeys; end-point behaviour being a foot-lift. In Group 1, 72% of tests ended in an end-point behaviour but the response rate was lower in Group 2 (20%), although TNTs were similar [(47.6 ± 3.3) and (47.3 ± 3.0) °C respectively] for responding animals. Rate of heating, ambient temperature and laterality (right or left) did not affect thresholds, but mean TNT was significantly higher in the forelimb (48.5 ± 2.8 °C) than the hind limb (47.4 ± 2.8 °C) (p = 0.012).

      Conclusions

      When a thermal probe cut-out temperature of 51 °C was used in TNT testing in the donkey a high proportion of tests did not produce an identifiable end point behaviour. Higher cut-out temperatures damaged the skin. Under these conditions, thermal nociceptive threshold testing appears not be an appropriate analgesiometry technique in the donkey.

      Clinical relevance

      TNT testing under these conditions is not suitable form of analgesiometry for donkeys.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Beecher HK
        The measurement of pain; prototype for the quantitative study of subjective responses.
        Pharmacol Rev. 1957; 9: 59-209
        • Dixon MJ
        • Taylor PM
        Refinement of thermal threshold probe to prevent burns.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2010; 37: 87
      1. Chapter 23 The forelimb of the horse.
        in: Dyce KM Sack WO Wensing CJG Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy. 4th edn. Saunders Elsevier, Missouri, USA2009: 586-623
      2. Chapter 24 The hindlimb of the horse.
        in: Dyce KM Sack WO Wensing CJG Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy. 4th edn. Saunders Elsevier, Missouri, USA2009: 624-643
        • Elfenbein JR
        • Sanchez LC
        • Robertson SA
        • et al.
        Effect of detomidine on visceral and somatic nociception and duodenal motility in conscious adult horses.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2009; 36: 162-172
        • Grint NJ
        • Beths T
        • Yvorchuk K
        • et al.
        The influence of various confounding factors on mechanical nociceptive thresholds in the donkey.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2014; (E-publication ahead of print Feb.)https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12132
        • Le Bars D
        • Gozariu M
        • Cadden SW
        Animal models of nociception.
        Pharmacol Rev. 2001; 53: 597-652
        • Love EJ
        Advances in the objective evaluation of pain and analgesic efficacy in horses. 2009: 32-47 (PhD. University of Bristol)
        • Love EJ
        • Murrell J
        • Whay HR
        Thermal and mechanical nociceptive threshold testing in horses: a review.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2011; 38: 3-14
        • Love EJ
        • Taylor PM
        • Murrell J
        • et al.
        Effects of acepromazine, butorphanol and buprenorphine on thermal and mechanical nociceptive thresholds in horses.
        Equine Vet J. 2012; 44: 221-225
        • Matthews NS
        • van Loon JPAM
        Anaesthesia and analgesia of the donkey and the mule.
        Equine Vet Educ. 2013; 25: 47-51
        • Musk GC
        • Murdoch FR
        • Tuke J
        • et al.
        Thermal and mechanical nociceptive threshold testing in pregnant sheep.
        Vet Anaeth Analg. 2014; 41: 305-311
        • Nielsen CS
        • Staud R
        • Price DD
        Individual differences in pain sensitivity: measurement, causation, and consequences.
        J Pain. 2009; 10: 231-237
        • Nolan A
        • Livingston A
        • Waterman AE
        Investigation of the antinociceptive activity of buprenorphine in sheep.
        Br J Pharmacol. 1987; 92: 527-533
        • Osgood PF
        • Carr DB
        • Kazianis A
        • et al.
        Antinociception in the rat induced by a cold environment.
        Brain Res. 1990; 507: 11-16
        • Pavlakovic G
        • Klinke I
        • Pavlakovic H
        • et al.
        Effect of thermal probe application pressure on thermal threshold detection.
        Musc Nerve. 2008; 38: 1498-1505
        • Robertson SA
        • Sanchez LC
        • Merritt AM
        • et al.
        Effect of systemic lidocaine on visceral and somatic nociception in conscious horses.
        Equine Vet J. 2005; 37: 122-127
        • Sanchez LC
        • Robertson SA
        • Maxwell LK
        • et al.
        Effect of fentanyl on visceral and somatic nociception in conscious horses.
        J Vet Intern Med. 2007; 21: 1067-1075
        • Sanchez LC
        • Elfenbein JR
        • Robertson SA
        Effect of acepromazine, butorphanol, or N-butylscopolammonium bromide on visceral and somatic nociception and duodenal motility in conscious horses.
        Am J Vet Res. 2008; 69: 579-585
        • Sarlani E
        • Farooq N
        • Greenspan JD
        Gender and laterality differences in thermosensation throughout the perceptible range.
        Pain. 2003; 106: 9-18
        • Spadavecchia C
        • Arendt-Nielsen L
        • Andersen OK
        • et al.
        Comparison of nociceptive withdrawal reflexes and recruitment curves between the forelimbs and hind limbs in conscious horses.
        Am J Vet Res. 2003; 64: 700-707
        • Strigo IA
        • Carli F
        • Bushnell MC
        Effect of ambient temperature on human pain and temperature perception.
        Anesthesiology. 2000; 92: 699-707
      3. Wegner K, Soma LR, Ippolito M, et al (2010). Validation of a wireless thermal and mechanical nocicpetive testing device in horses. Presented at the Penn Vet Annual Faculty Research Retreat, Kennett Square, USA.

        • Welsh EM
        • Nolan AM
        Effect of flunixin meglumine on the thresholds to mechanical stimulation in healthy and lame sheep.
        Res Vet Sci. 1995; 58: 61-66
        • Whay HR
        The perception and relief of pain associated with lameness in dairy cattle. 1998: 104-131 (PhD. University of Bristol)
        • Yeomans DC
        • Proudfit HK
        Nociceptive responses to high and low rates of noxious cutaneous heating are mediated by different nociceptors in the rat: electrophysiological evidence.
        Pain. 1996; 68: 141-150
        • Zachariou V
        • Goldstein BD
        • Yeomans DC
        Low but not high rate noxious radiant skin heating evokes a capsaicin-sensitive increase in spinal cord dorsal horn release of substance P.
        Brain Res. 1997; 752: 143-150