Advertisement

Factors affecting mechanical nociceptive thresholds in healthy sows

      Abstract

      Objective

      To describe anatomical and methodological factors influencing mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNTs) and intra-site variability in healthy sows.

      Study design

      Prospective, randomized validation.

      Animals

      Eight pregnant, healthy, mixed-parity sows (176–269 kg).

      Methods

      Repeated MNT measurements were taken: 1) with a hand-held probe and a limb-mounted actuator connected to a digital algometer; 2) at nine landmarks on the limbs and tail; and 3) at 1 and 3 minute intervals. Data were analysed using linear mixed regression models.

      Results

      The MNTs (±SEM) of the limbs were lower with the probe (14.7 ± 1.2 N) than with the actuator (21.3 ± 1.2 N; p < 0.001), in the pelvic versus the thoracic limbs (16.7 ± 1.2 versus 19.2 ± 1.2 N; p < 0.001), and in the lateral versus the dorsal metatarsi and metacarpi (17.6 ± 1.2 versus 18.4 ± 1.2 N; p = 0.002). MNTs were higher in all subsequent measurements compared with the first (p < 0.001) and in the morning compared with the afternoon (p = 0.04). We found no evidence of MNT differences based on interval between consecutive measurements (1 versus 3 minutes). Variability was lower in the thoracic limbs [mean back-transformed log10 coefficient of variation (CV) ± SE = 25.5 ± 1.5% versus 30.6 ± 1.5% in the pelvic limbs; p < 0.001], with the actuator (22.7 ± 1.5% versus 33.4 ± 1.5% with the probe; p < 0.001), and on the left (CV = 26.9 ± 1.5% versus 29.3 ± 1.5% on the right; p = 0.01). Tail data (probe only) were analysed separately: mean MNT (± SE) was 11.7 (±1.8); MNT increased in days 3–6 of testing compared with day 1 (p < 0.001). The mean CV (±SE) was 38.9% (±1.1%).

      Conclusions and clinical relevance

      MNTs and intra-site variability in healthy sows were affected by several factors, indicating that this methodology requires considerable attention to detail.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bland JM
        • Altman DG
        Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
        Lancet. 1986; 1: 307-310
        • Bove G
        Mechanical sensory threshold testing using nylon monofilaments: the pain field’s ‘tin standard’.
        Pain. 2006; 124: 13-17
        • Caplen G
        • Baker L
        • Hothersall B
        • et al.
        Thermal nociception as a measure of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug effectiveness in broiler chickens with articular pain.
        Vet J. 2013; 198: 616-619
        • Colditz IG
        • Paull DR
        • Hervault G
        • et al.
        Development of a lameness model in sheep for assessing efficacy of analgesics.
        Aust Vet J. 2011; 89: 297-304
        • Coleman KD
        • Schmiedt CW
        • Kirkby KA
        • et al.
        Learning confounds algometric assessment of mechanical thresholds in normal dogs.
        Vet Surg. 2014; 43: 361-367
        • Di Giminiani P
        • Herskin MS
        • Viitasaari E
        Assessment of mechanical pain sensitivity in the pig’s tail.
        Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the WAFL, Guelph, Canada, 8–11 August. 2011;
        • Di Giminiani P
        • Petersen LJ
        • Herskin MS
        Nociceptive responses to thermal and mechanical stimulations in awake pigs.
        Eur J Pain. 2013; 17: 638-648
        • Di Giminiani P
        • Stausholm JS
        • Viitasaari E
        • et al.
        The effect of social isolation, gender and familiarity with the experimental procedure on tests of porcine nociceptive thresholds.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2015; 42: 647-655
        • Dixon MJ
        • Taylor PM
        • Steagall PVM
        • et al.
        Development of a pressure nociceptive threshold testing device for evaluation of analgesics in cats.
        Res Vet Sci. 2007; 82: 85-92
        • Dohoo IR
        • Tillard E
        • Stryhn H
        • et al.
        The use of multilevel models to evaluate sources of variation in reproductive performance in dairy cattle in Reunion Island.
        Prev Vet Med. 2001; 50: 127-144
        • Duan G
        • Xiang G
        • Zhang X
        • et al.
        An improvement of mechanical pain sensitivity measurement method: the smaller sized probes may detect heterogeneous sensory threshold in healthy male subjects.
        Pain Med. 2014; 15: 272-280
        • Fitzpatrick JL
        • Young FJ
        • Eckersall D
        • et al.
        Recognising and controlling pain and inflammation in mastitis.
        in: Proceedings of the British Mastitis Conference. Institute of Animal Health, Compton, Stoneleigh1998: 36-44
        • Fosse TK
        • Spadavecchia C
        • Horsberg TE
        • et al.
        Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of meloxicam in piglets subjected to a kaolin inflammation model.
        J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 34: 367-375
        • Fosse TK
        • Toutain PL
        • Spadavecchia C
        • et al.
        Ketoprofen in piglets: enantioselective pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and PK/PD modelling.
        J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 34: 338-349
        • Greenspan JD
        • McGillis SL
        Stimulus features relevant to the perception of sharpness and mechanically evoked cutaneous pain.
        Somatosens Mot Res. 1991; 8: 137-147
        • Greenspan JD
        • Thomadaki M
        • McGillis SL
        Spatial summation of perceived pressure, sharpness and mechanically evoked cutaneous pain.
        Somatosens Mot Res. 1997; 14: 107-112
        • Grint NJ
        • Beths T
        • Yvorchuk K
        • et al.
        The influence of various confounding factors on mechanical nociceptive thresholds in the donkey.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2014; 41: 421-429
        • Haussler KK
        • Erb HN
        Mechanical nociceptive thresholds in the axial skeleton of horses.
        Equine Vet J. 2006; 38: 70-75
        • Haussler KK
        • Hill AE
        • Frisbie DD
        • et al.
        Determination and use of mechanical nociceptive thresholds of the thoracic limb to assess pain associated with induced osteoarthritis of the middle carpal joint in horses.
        Am J Vet Res. 2007; 68: 1167-1176
        • Hutson GD
        A note on hunger in the pig: sows on restricted rations will sustain an energy deficit to gain additional food.
        Animal Prod. 1991; 52: 233-235
        • Imamura M
        • Tomikawa Imamura S
        • Kaziyama HHS
        • et al.
        Impact of nervous system hyperalgesia on pain, disability and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a controlled analysis.
        Arthrit Care Res. 2008; 59: 1424-1431
        • International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) Taxonomy
        (Accessed 11 September, 2015.)
        • Janczak AM
        • Ranheim B
        • Fosse TK
        • et al.
        Factors affecting mechanical (nociceptive) thresholds in piglets.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2012; 39: 628-635
        • Jones DH
        • Kilgour RD
        • Comtois AS
        Test–retest reliability of pressure pain threshold measurements of the upper limb and torso in young healthy women.
        J Pain. 2007; 8: 650-656
        • Kemp MH
        • Nolan AM
        • Cripps PJ
        • et al.
        Animal-based measurements of the severity of mastitis in dairy cows.
        Vet Rec. 2008; 163: 175-179
        • LaGraize SC
        • Borzan J
        • Rinker MM
        • et al.
        Behavioural evidence for competing motivational drives of nociception and hunger.
        Neurosci Lett. 2004; 372: 30-34
        • Laursen B
        • Bajai P
        • Olesen AS
        • et al.
        Health related quality of life and quantitative pain measurement in females with chronic non-malignant pain.
        Eur J Pain. 2005; 9: 267-275
        • Le Bars D
        • Gozariu M
        • Cadden SW
        Animal models of nociception.
        Pharmacol Rev. 2001; 53: 597-652
        • Ley SJ
        • Waterman AE
        • Livingstone A
        A field study on the effect of lameness on mechanical nociceptive thresholds in sheep.
        Vet Rec. 1995; 137: 85-87
        • Mogil JS
        Animal models of pain: progress and challenges.
        Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10: 283-294
        • Mogil JS
        Pain genetics: past, present and future.
        Trends Genet. 2012; 28: 258-266
        • Mohling CM
        • Johnson AK
        • Coetzee JF
        • et al.
        Evaluation of mechanical and thermal nociception as objective tools to measure painful and nonpainful lameness phases in multiparous sows.
        J Anim Sci. 2014; 92: 3073-3081
        • Musk GC
        • Murdoch FR
        • Tuke J
        • et al.
        Thermal and mechanical nociceptive threshold testing in pregnant sheep.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2014; 31: 305-311
        • Nalon E
        • Maes D
        • Piepers S
        • et al.
        Mechanical nociception thresholds in lame sows: evidence of hyperalgesia as measured by two different methods.
        Vet J. 2013; 198: 386-390
        • Nalon E
        • Maes D
        • Van Dongen S
        • et al.
        Comparison of the inter-and intra-observer repeatability of three gait-scoring scales for sows.
        Animal. 2014; 8: 650-659
        • Pairis-Garcia MD
        • Johnson AK
        • Stalder KJ
        • et al.
        Measuring the efficacy of flunixin meglumine and meloxicam for lame sows using nociceptive threshold tests.
        Anim Welf. 2014; 23: 219-229
        • Polianskis R
        • Graven-Nielsen T
        • Arendt-Nielsen L
        Computer-controlled pneumatic pressure algometry – a new technique for quantitative sensory testing.
        Eur J Pain. 2001; 5: 267-277
        • Raundal PM
        • Andersen PH
        • Toft N
        • et al.
        Handheld mechanical nociceptive threshold testing in dairy cows – intra-individual variation, inter-observer agreement and variation over time.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2014; 41: 660-669
        • Rolke R
        • Campbell KA
        • Magerl W
        • et al.
        Deep pain thresholds in the distal limbs of healthy human subjects.
        Eur J Pain. 2005; 9: 39-48
        • Ruscheweyh R
        • Kreusch A
        • Albers C
        • et al.
        The effect of distraction strategies on pain perception and the nociceptive flexor reflex (RIII reflex).
        Pain. 2011; 152: 2662-2671
        • Sandercock DA
        • Gibson IF
        • Brash HM
        • et al.
        Development of a mechanical stimulator and force measurement system for the assessment of nociceptive thresholds in pigs.
        J Neurosci Methods. 2009; 182: 64-70
        • Slugg RM
        • Meyer RA
        • Campbell JN
        Response of cutaneous A-and C-fiber nociceptors in the monkey to controlled-force stimuli.
        J Neurophysiol. 2000; 83: 2179-2191
        • Stubsjøen SM
        • Valle PS
        • Zanella AJ
        The use of a hand-held algometer as a method to measure mechanical nociceptive thresholds in sheep.
        Anim Welfare. 2010; 19: 31-36
        • Tapper KR
        • Johnson AK
        • Karriker LA
        • et al.
        Pressure algometry and thermal sensitivity for assessing pain sensitivity and effects of flunixin meglumine and sodium salicylate in a transient lameness model in sows.
        Livest Sci. 2013; 157: 245-253
        • Taylor PM
        • Dixon M
        A review of mechanical nociceptive threshold data in eight mammalian species.
        in: Proceedings of the 14th World Congress on Pain. Non- Human Species-Special Interest Group, Milan, Italy2012: 12 (August)
        • Taylor PM
        • Dixon MJ
        The relationship between probe tip diameter and mechanical nociceptive threshold.
        in: Proceedings of the 14th World Congress on Pain. Non- Human Species-Special Interest Group, Milan, Italy2012: 3 (August)
        • Taylor PM
        • Crosignani N
        • Lopes C
        • et al.
        Mechanical nociceptive thresholds using four probe configurations in horses.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2016; 43: 99-108
        • Thorup VM
        • Tøgersen FA
        • Jørgensen B
        • et al.
        Biomechanical gait analysis of pigs walking on solid concrete floor.
        Animal. 2007; 1: 708-715
        • Treede RD
        • Rolke R
        • Andrews K
        • et al.
        Pain elicited by blunt pressure: neurobiological basis and clinical relevance.
        Pain. 2002; 98: 235-240
        • Whay HR
        • Waterman AE
        • Webster AJF
        • et al.
        The influence of lesion type on the duration of hyperalgesia associated with hind limb lameness in dairy cattle.
        Vet J. 1998; 156: 23-29
        • Whay HR
        • Webster AJ
        • Waterman-Pearson AE
        Role of ketoprofen in the modulation of hyperalgesia associated with lameness in dairy cattle.
        Vet Rec. 2005; 157: 729-733
        • Ylinen J
        • Nykänen M
        • Kautiainen H
        • et al.
        Evaluation of repeatability of pressure algometry on the neck muscles for clinical use.
        Man Ther. 2007; 12: 192-197

      Uncited Reference

        • Thrusfield M
        • Ortega C
        • de Blas I
        • et al.
        WIN EPISCOPE 2.0: improved epidemiological software for veterinary medicine.
        Vet Rec. 2001; 148: 567-572