Research Paper| Volume 43, ISSUE 2, P118-127, March 2016

Publication rate of studies presented at veterinary anaesthesia specialty meetings during the years 2003–2008



      To assess publication rates, factors predicting publication, and discrepancies between conference abstracts and subsequent full-text publications of abstracts from the veterinary meetings of the American College of Veterinary Anesthesiologists and the Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists from 2003 to 2008.

      Study design

      Retrospective cohort study.


      A total of 607 abstracts were identified and a database search (Scopus, PubMed, CAB) was conducted to identify matching publications. Authors of nonmatching abstracts were contacted to participate in a confidential online survey. Risk ratios were used to assess factors predicting publication and these were tested for significance (p < 0.05) using Fisher's exact test.


      The overall publication rate was 63.3% and the mean (± SD) time to publication was 25 ± 19 months. Factors significantly associated with subsequent full publication (i.e. publication of a full manuscript in a peer-reviewed journal) were continent of origin (North America), study design (experimental studies), specialty (analgesia) and the presence of a source of funding. The principal reasons why studies remained unpublished were lack of time and responsibility lying with co-authors. Minor changes compared with the original abstract were found in 71.6% of all publications. Major changes were noted in 34.6% and the outcome of the study changed in 7.6%.

      Conclusions and clinical relevance

      These data suggest that some of the abstracts reported preliminary findings. Therefore, caution is warranted when quoting abstracts as references in scientific publications. To date, major veterinary journals have not issued recommendations in their author guidelines addressing the use of abstracts as a reference. The authors propose the inclusion of such a statement in author guidelines.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Autorino R
        • Quarto G
        • Di Lorenzo G
        • et al.
        Are abstracts presented at the EAU meeting followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals? A critical analysis.
        Eur Urol. 2007; 51: 833-840
        • Bagheri S
        • Lenox N
        • Verschueren D
        • et al.
        Abstracts from the American Assciation of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons annual scientific meeting: proportion published and time to publication.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63: 838-840
        • Balasubramanian S
        • Kumar I
        • Wyld L
        • et al.
        Publication of surgical abstracts in full text: a retrospective cohort study.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006; 88: 57-61
        • Brace S
        • Taylor D
        • O’Connor AM
        The quality of reporting and publication status of vaccines trials presented at veterinary conferences from 1988 to 2003.
        Vaccine. 2010; 28: 5306-5314
        • Castillo J
        • Guasch RG
        • Cifuentes I
        Fate of abstracts presented at 1995 European society of Anaesthesiologists meetings.
        Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002; 19: 888-893
        • Clutton E
        Factors affecting publication sequence.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2005; 32: 59-60
        • Dahllöf G
        • Wondimu B
        • Maniere MC
        Subsequent publication of abstracts presented at the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry meetings.
        Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008; 18: 91-97
        • Dickersin K
        • Min YI
        Publication bias: the problem that won’t go away.
        Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993; 703: 135-148
        • Drury NE
        • Maniakis-Grivas G
        • Rogers VJC
        The fate of abstracts presented at annual meetings of the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland from 1993 to 2007.
        Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012; 42: 885-889
        • Dyson DH
        • Sparling SC
        Delay in final publication following abstract presentation: American College of Veterinary Anesthesiologists annual meeting.
        J Vet Med Educ. 2006; 33: 145-148
        • Hartling L
        • Bond K
        • Harvey K
        • et al.
        Developing and testing a tool for the classification of study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures. US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD2010: H4
        • Hasenboehler E
        • Choudhry I
        • Newman J
        • et al.
        Bias towards publishing positive results in orthopedic and general surgery: a patient safety issue?.
        Patient Saf Surg. 2007; 1: 4-10
        • Lee D
        • Yuan JCC
        • Prasad S
        Analysis of abstracts presented at the prosthodontic research section of IADR general sessions 2004–2005: demographics, publication rates, and factors contributing to publication.
        J Prosthodont. 2012; 21: 225-231
        • Man JP
        • Jg W
        • Tsang M
        • et al.
        Why do some countries publish more than others? An international comparison of research funding, English proficiency and publication output in highly ranked general medical journals.
        Eur J Epidemiol. 2004; 19: 811-817
        • Meininger D
        • Bück M
        • Bohlmann S
        • et al.
        Gone with the wind or… Fate of scientific articles presented at large anesthesia congresses–an update.
        Anaesthesist. 2011; 60: 118-124
        • Meranze J
        • Ellison N
        • Greenhow DE
        Publications resulting from anesthesia meeting abstracts.
        Anesth Analg. 1982; 61: 445-448
        • Nader F
        • Mousavizadeh K
        • Ghafourifar P
        Annual International Geographic Medicine Congress Meetings in Shiraz, Iran: Publication Rates during 1999-2006.
        Int J Biomed Sci. 2009; 5: 44-49
        • Paulson K
        • Saeed M
        • Mills J
        • et al.
        Publication bias is present in blood and marrow transplantation: an analysis of abstracts at an international meeting.
        Blood. 2011; 118: 6698-6701
        • Rosmarakis ES
        • Soteriades ES
        • Vergidis PI
        • et al.
        From conference abstract to full paper: differences between data presented in conferences and journals.
        FASEB J. 2005; 19: 673-680
        • Sanossian N
        • Ohanian A
        • Saver J
        • et al.
        Frequency and determinants of nonpublication of research in the stroke literature.
        Stroke. 2006; 37: 2588-2592
        • Scherer RW
        • Langenberg P
        • von Elm E
        Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (Review).
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; : MR000005
        • Schmidt P
        Evidence-based veterinary medicine: evolution, revolution, or repackaging of veterinary practice?.
        Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2007; 37: 409-417
        • Schulte TL
        • Trost M
        • Osada N
        • et al.
        Publication rate of abstracts presented at the Annual Congress of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012; 132: 271-280
        • Smith HD
        • Bogenschutz ED
        • Bayliss AJ
        • et al.
        Full-text publication of abstract-presented work in physical therapy: do therapists publish what they preach?.
        Phys Ther. 2011; 91: 234-245
        • Snedeker KG
        • Campbell M
        • Totton SC
        • et al.
        Comparison of outcomes and other variables between conference abstracts and subsequent peer-reviewed papers involving pre-harvest or abattoir-level interventions against foodborne pathogens.
        Prev Vet Med. 2010; 97: 67-76
        • Snedeker KG
        • Totton SC
        • Sargeant JM
        Analysis of trends in the full publication of papers from conference abstracts involving pre-harvest or abattoir-level interventions against foodborne pathogens.
        Prev Vet Med. 2010; 95: 1-9
        • Sprague S
        • Bhandari M
        • Devereaux PJ
        Barriers to full-text publication following presentation of abstracts at annual orthopaedic meetings.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85-A: 158-163
        • Taddio A
        • Pain T
        • Fassos FF
        Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association.
        Can Med Assoc J. 1994; 150: 1611-1615
        • Voleti PB
        • Donegan DJ
        • Kim TWB
        Level of evidence: does it change the rate of publication and time to publication of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons presentations?.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 2013; 95-A (1–5): e2
        • Weber EJ
        • Callaham ML
        • Wears RL
        Unpublished research from a medical specialy meeting. Why investigators fail to publish.
        J Am Med Assoc. 1998; 280: 257-259