Advertisement

ARRIVE and CONSORT guidelines: do they have a place in Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia?

      During an ethics panel discussion at the 2015 spring meeting of the Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists in Cáceres, Spain, the panel put a question to the audience: ‘Why do you perform research?’ The answers referred to board examination requirements, career promotion and employment obligations, and the desire to answer a scientific question. Professor R. Eddie Clutton then stated the best answer in one word: we should perform research in order to seek the TRUTH. Unfortunately, the ‘truth’ is often not a set of fancy significant differences and nor does it impress promotion review committees or high-impact journal editors.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Begg C
        • Cho M
        • Eastwood S
        • et al.
        Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials – the CONSORT statement.
        JAMA. 1996; 276: 637-639
        • Campagna I
        • Schwarz A
        • Keller S
        • et al.
        Comparison of the effects of propofol or alfaxalone for anaesthesia induction and maintenance on respiration in cats.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2015; 42: 484-492
        • Conde Ruiz C
        • Del Carro A
        • Rosset E
        • et al.
        Alfaxalone for total intravenous anaesthesia in bitches undergoing elective caesarean section and its effects on puppies: a randomized clinical trial.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2015; ([Epub ahead of print].)https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12298
        • von Elm E
        • Altman DG
        • Egger M
        • et al.
        The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
        PLoS Med. 2007; 4: e296
        • Festing MFW
        We should be designing better experiments.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2003; 30: 59-61
        • Grindlay D
        Reporting guidelines: how can they be implemented by veterinary journals?.
        Equine Vet J. 2015; 47: 133-134
        • Hartnack S
        Issues and pitfalls in method comparison studies.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2014; 41: 227-232
        • Howells DW
        • Sena ES
        • Macleod MR
        Bringing rigour to translational medicine.
        Nat Rev Neurol. 2014; 10: 37-43
        • Ioannidis JP
        How to make more published research true.
        PLoS Med. 2014; 11: e1001747
        • Kilkenny C
        • Browne WJ
        • Cuthill IC
        • et al.
        Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research.
        PLoS Biol. 2010; 8: e1000412
        • Lang TA
        • Altman DG
        Basic statistical reporting for articles published in biomedical journals: the ‘Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature’ or the SAMPL Guidelines.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2015; 52: 5-9
        • Moher D
        • Liberati A
        • Tetzlaff J
        • et al.
        Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
        PLoS Med. 2009; 6: e1000097
        • Moher D
        • Hopewell S
        • Schulz KF
        • et al.
        CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63: e1-e37
        • More SJ
        Improving the quality of reporting in veterinary journals: how far do we need to go with reporting guidelines?.
        Vet J. 2010; 184: 249-250
        • Nalon E
        • Maes D
        • Piepers S
        • et al.
        Factors affecting mechanical nociceptive thresholds in healthy sows.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2015; ([Epub ahead of print])https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12313
      1. Notice of formal retraction of articles by Dr. Y. Fujii.
        Br J Anaesth. 2013; 110 ([No authors listed]): 669
        • Prasse S
        • Schrack J
        • Wenger S
        • et al.
        Clinical evaluation of the v-gel supraglottic airway device in comparison with a classical laryngeal mask and endotracheal intubation in cats during spontaneous and controlled mechanical ventilation.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2016; 43: 55-62
        • Rennie D
        Reporting randomized controlled trials. An experiment and a call for responses from readers.
        JAMA. 1995; 273: 1054-1055
        • Roig M
        Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: a guide to ethical writing.
        (Accessed 7 Nov, 2015.)
        • Sargeant JM
        • O’Connor AM
        • Gardner IA
        • et al.
        The REFLECT statement: reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials in livestock and food safety: explanation and elaboration.
        J Food Prot. 2010; 73: 579-603
        • Sarotti D
        • Rabozzi R
        • Franci P
        Comparison of epidural versus intrathecal anaesthesia in dogs undergoing pelvic limb orthopaedic surgery.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2015; 42: 405-413
        • Shafer SL
        Editor’s note: notice of retraction.
        Anesth Analg. 2014; 119: 25
        • Thompson K
        • Rioja A
        Effects of intravenous and topical laryngeal lidocaine on heart rate, mean arterial pressure and cough response to endotracheal intubation in dogs.
        Vet Anaesth Analg. 2015; ([Epub ahead of print])https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12303
        • Turner L
        • Shamseer L
        • Altman DG
        • et al.
        Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review.
        Syst Rev. 2012; 1: 60